Nvidia Fell 3.5% in the Memory Crash. The Real Question Isn't the Price, It's Thursday.
Nvidia dropped about 3.5% to 203 as the SK Hynix profit scare dragged the entire AI chip complex lower, Broadcom, AMD and Qualcomm all red. On a day like this the instinct is to panic about whether the AI trade is finally rolling over. I think that is the wrong question. The right question is what TSMC says on Thursday, because that is the one report that actually answers whether the demand is real.
Why today's selloff is a margin story, not a demand story
The trigger for the whole rout was a note saying SK Hynix Q2 profit would miss on HBM contract pricing. That is about how much of the boom the memory makers capture, not about whether the boom exists. Nvidia falling in sympathy is guilt by association, not new information about Nvidia's own demand. Its order book, its data center revenue, and Jensen's 3 to 4 trillion dollar capex thesis did not change because a Korean brokerage cut a profit estimate.
Thursday is the actual test
TSMC reports Q2 on Thursday, and it is the single cleanest read on AI chip demand in the market, because it manufactures for Nvidia, Apple, AMD and almost everyone else. If TSMC guides advanced packaging capacity higher and raises its full-year outlook, it confirms the demand the memory selloff is trying to question. If TSMC sounds cautious, then today was the first warning and I am wrong to hold. One report, Thursday, settles the debate the whole complex is having this week.
How I am positioned
I hold $NVIDIA(NVDA.US) and I did not sell into today's sympathy drop, because selling the leader on someone else's margin miss is a classic retail mistake. But I am not adding either, not with CPI tonight and TSMC Thursday. My plan is to let CPI clear, let TSMC give the real demand read on Thursday, and then decide whether this dip was a gift or a warning. Until then I hold the core and keep my hands off the buy button. The tape is noisy. Thursday is signal.
Not financial advice, just waiting for the real data.
The copyright of this article belongs to the original author/organization.
The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not reflect the stance of the platform. The content is intended for investment reference purposes only and shall not be considered as investment advice. Please contact us if you have any questions or suggestions regarding the content services provided by the platform.
